James Mason, R. Kelly’s former manager, has agreed to stay away from the singer’s girlfriend Joycelyn Savage and her family, TMZ reports. As a result, the district attorney’s office in Henry County, Illinois has dropped its terroristic threats case against him.

According to the outlet, the court agreed to dismiss the case if Mason agreed to a permanent protective order that prohibits him from contacting Savage, her father or any member of her family.

Savage’s father previously claimed that Mason called and threatened him in 2018, saying, “I’m gonna do harm to you and your family. When I see you I’m gonna get you. I’m going to fucking kill you.”

At the time, Savage’s parents were trying to get their daughter to return home and leave her now-incarcerated boyfriend, R. Kelly. After reporting the threat to police, an arrest warrant was issued for Mason on charges of felony terroristic threats. The music manager eventually turned himself in to authorities and was released on a $10,000 bond.

Savage has continued to support Kelly and maintains that she’s not being held against her will in the relationship.

As reported by REVOLT, the former R&B star was convicted of racketeering, sexual exploitation of a child, bribery, kidnapping and sex trafficking charges last year. He was also found guilty of violating the Mann Act and is set to be sentenced this May.

Kelly is also facing federal charges of child pornography and obstruction of justice charges in Illinois. The 55-year-old is accused of recording sexual encounters with minors and bribing individuals to reclaim copies of the sex tapes.

The trial is currently set to take place in Chicago on Aug. 1. However, two of Kelly’s attorneys, Steve Greenberg and Michael Leonard, have filed to be withdrawn from the case. The two lawyers also asked to be excused from Kelly’s New York trial, writing to the judge at the time, “Our reasons for withdrawal are significant and it is impossible, in our belief, for us to be able to continue to properly represent Mr. Kelly under the current circumstances.”

However, they said they were “willing to [serve] as effective stand-by counsel” if required by the court.